China’s risky shadow banks back in spotlight after Beijing’s debt crackdown



China’s crackdown on borrowing by local governments is forcing state-run entities in even some of the wealthiest provinces to tap costly credit from non-bank lenders, a stopgap that is increasing risk in an opaque corner of the financial system.

The borrowing marks a return of China’s shadow-banking market, which is more loosely regulated than traditional lenders and had been reined in over the past few years in a bid to reduce risk. Since September, industrial investment arms and financing platforms owned by local governments in provinces including Shandong had borrowed billions of dollars in total from trust companies and leasing firms, according to people familiar with the matter.

The rates charged were 8 per cent or higher – more than triple the cost of borrowing in the bond market, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. Financial institutions that make up China’s shadow banking system are willing to extend the funding partly because they’re short of assets in a low-rate environment.

The increased demand reflects the fallout from Beijing’s campaign to keep provinces from amassing debt through state-owned companies known as local government financing vehicles, or LGFVs. The effort has choked off their access to cheaper funding such as regular bank lending and bond sales, contributing to a pullback of investment in the world’s second-biggest economy.

“Platforms in rich regions wouldn’t have to resort to such expensive funding should fiscal discipline be less strict,” said Jacqueline Rong, chief China economist at BNP Paribas SA. “The campaign to resolve hidden debt and the fiscal discipline might be a key reason for the deep slump in infrastructure investment.”

China’s Ministry of Finance, the National Financial Regulatory Administration and Shandong’s government press service did not respond to requests for comment.

As interest payments piled up, and with expenses of settling the cost of projects coming due in the fourth quarter, the firms had little choice but to refinance at higher rates to keep their businesses running and avert default, said the people.

  • Related Posts

    What does the new BIA mean for businesses and Indians? – Firstpost

    The India-Israel Bilateral Investment Agreement (BIA) officially came into force on Saturday (July 4, 2026). Signed in New Delhi on September 8 last year, the agreement replaces the nearly 30-year-old…

    Continue reading
    Mukesh Ambani, Sunil Bharti Mittal join global AI body to shape responsible AI – Firstpost

    Reliance Industries Chairman and Managing Director Mukesh Ambani has been named a founding member of the newly launched AI for Good Global Commission, joining an influential group of 44 global…

    Continue reading

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *