Media365
A draft of the “Anti-Monopoly Compliance Guidelines for Internet Platforms”, published over the weekend by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), focused heavily on the sophisticated, often opaque ways in which online platforms with significant market power can exploit technological advantages to exclude rivals and harm consumer interests.
The document identified eight “new risks”, including collusion among platforms through coordinated algorithms to fix pricing and commission fees, dominant players forcing merchants to sign exclusive contracts, and practices like excessive subsidies or unjustified refusals to allow merchants to operate stores.
It explicitly prohibited platforms with a dominant market position from “imposing application-layer or network-layer blockade or exclusion measures against transaction counterparties”. Chinese internet giants, including Alibaba Group Holding, Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, previously built “walled gardens” – like Alibaba’s Taobao not offering Tencent’s WeChat Pay, or WeChat not redirecting links of ByteDance’s Douyin short video app – but the restrictions started to ease last year. Alibaba owns the South China Morning Post.
SAMR demanded that platform operators “conduct targeted screening and dynamic monitoring of core algorithmic models, including pricing algorithms, recommendation systems, ranking and advertising placement strategies.” It added that “particular attention should be paid to identifying discriminatory design, unfair transaction practices, excessive price adjustments, and uniform pricing promotions”.
