JD Vance calls impeachment push against Pete Hegseth ‘absurd’, says move is not about Iran war | World News


US Vice President JD Vance

US Vice President JD Vance has defended Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth against the impeachment effort, calling the proceedings “absurd” and arguing that the move reflects opposition to his changes at the Pentagon rather than concerns over the US military campaign in Iran.In an X post, Vance rejected the suggestion that Hegseth had committed impeachable offences and criticised lawmakers for turning impeachment into a substitute for legislative action.“Has Pete Hegseth committed impeachable crimes? The question is absurd, and the answer is: obviously not,” Vance wrote.He argued that Congress had other ways to express disagreements over government policy but was choosing impeachment instead. Referring to previous efforts to impeach President Donald Trump, Vance said lawmakers were relying on a process that required less effort than passing legislation.“Legislation is hard. Impeachments are easy (and ultimately, inconsequential),” he wrote.Vance also identified two decisions by Hegseth that he believes have drawn opposition from lawmakers: shifting US military forces away from Europe and Ukraine, and restructuring the general officer corps.He said these changes, rather than the Iran conflict, were behind the effort to remove the defence secretary, describing the dispute as a challenge to the Pentagon’s established bureaucracy.“This isn’t about Iran, this is about the fact that Pete took on the bureaucracy at the Pentagon,” Vance wrote.Hegseth has separately dismissed the impeachment push as a “farce” and a “stunt”, accusing political opponents of attempting to stage a “show trial”. He has also faced questions over allegations that he used military powers without congressional authorisation and abused his position.

  • Related Posts

    In 2020, a Texas woman planned a 160-square-foot backyard office but her HOA rejected it over height rules; in 2026, judges upheld $100,000 in legal fees after finding the restriction did not apply

    The HOA challenged Davis’s legal-fee recovery, disputing statutory entitlement and the allocation of litigation expenses. In a Texas case, a homeowner challenged an association’s rejection of her proposed backyard office…

    Continue reading
    A Texas estate said a 2009 deed carried its late owner’s forged signature; after a man tied to the transfer was sentenced to 10 years, an appeals court ruled the estate could withdraw its claims against a later buyer

    Representative Image (AI-generated) A disputed property deed can leave an estate fighting to recover land years after its owner’s death, particularly when the signature authorising the original transfer is alleged…

    Continue reading