In 2020, a 30-foot dead tree limb fell on a 28-year-old physics student jogging in a Sacramento park; six years later, a jury awarded him $33.3 million after finding the city responsible


A jury in Sacramento, California, has ordered city authorities to pay $33.3 million (£25.6 million) to a former physics student who suffered a serious brain injury when a 30-foot dead tree branch fell on him while he was jogging through a city park. Michael Flynn, then 28, was jogging along a public walking path around McKinley Park in April 2020 when the large branch broke off an unmaintained tree and struck him.After a personal injury trial in Superior Court, a jury found the City of Sacramento 100 per cent responsible for the accident. The jury concluded that city officials had failed to maintain public trees and had ignored basic safety inspection procedures. Court filings published on October 9, 2026, and reporting by CBS Sacramento confirmed that the jury awarded Flynn $33.3 million in total damages. The money is intended to cover ongoing medical bills, rehabilitation costs, and lost future earnings.

Life-altering injuries and academic perseverance

The falling branch caused severe head injuries and long-term problems affecting Flynn’s brain and nervous system. “I look back on the period immediately following the accident. It was an extremely bleak period of my life. It was, very hard,” Flynn told CBS Sacramento in an interview after the verdict. Although Flynn needed extensive medical care and neurological rehabilitation over six years, he completed his postgraduate studies and earned a doctorate in physics. However, he said the physical and mental effects of the injury changed his career plans and daily life. “Not a day goes by, not an hour goes by, that I don’t feel the consequences of that accident. It was absolutely terrible,” Flynn said in comments reported by CBS Sacramento.

Negligence findings and inspection failures

During the trial, lawyers from Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora P.C., the law firm representing Flynn, presented evidence that the 30-foot tree branch had been dead for several years before the accident in 2020. According to case updates published by Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora P.C., city forestry records and expert testimony showed that the danger was clearly visible. The evidence indicated that routine tree inspections would have identified the dead branch and led to its removal. The law firm said city authorities had failed to carry out standard maintenance along busy park paths. As a result, decaying branches were left hanging over public walkways. The city’s lawyers argued during the trial that local government could not reasonably inspect every tree across all municipal parks. However, the jury rejected this argument and found the city fully responsible for allowing a dangerous condition to remain on public property.

Demand for public safety oversight

The verdict is one of the largest personal injury awards recorded against the City of Sacramento over poor park maintenance. Speaking to CBS Sacramento after the ruling, Flynn urged residents to demand greater accountability from city officials for maintaining public infrastructure and parks. “The city has a responsibility to look after the people who live in it,” Flynn told CBS Sacramento, adding that local communities should expect public spaces to be kept safe. City officials have not publicly confirmed whether Sacramento authorities plan to appeal the $33.3 million decision or ask the court to reduce the jury’s award after the trial.

  • Related Posts

    A Roman stone coffin found at Westminster Abbey in 1869 bore the name of a man from 1,600 years ago, but new tests date the skeleton inside to AD 987–1052; archaeologists say it may be one of two medieval abbots

    Researchers found white lime residue tracing the outline of a lost rectangular wooden coffin surrounding the sarcophagus. For more than a century, a stone coffin at Westminster Abbey carried the…

    Continue reading
    After 12 years of demolition threats, residents of two 1960s London housing estates may finally keep their homes; Lambeth Council has proposed abandoning the rebuild plans, with a cabinet decision due October 21

    Residents of two landmark 1960s housing estates in south London may finally be able to remain in their homes after more than 12 years of uncertainty. Lambeth Council has proposed…

    Continue reading